Chiasmus: Structural and Functional Peculiarities in English Literary and Political Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ijllal.v2i4.1509Keywords:
rhetorical device, inverted parallelism, reversal of grammatical structure, symmetrical structure, wordplay, literary device, poetic technique prose writing, classical literature, political speechesAbstract
This article is devoted to the analysis of stylistic device of chiasmus in English literary texts. Various examples of chiasmus in English literature and how they contribute to the meaning and impact of the text is analyzed emphasizing on the fact that chiasmus can be an effective tool for stressing key themes, creating memorable phrases, and engaging the reader through its rhythmic and poetic qualities. Additionally, how chiasmus has been used in different literary genres, including poetry, prose, and drama is studied and suggestions are made that a deeper understanding of chiasmus can enhance the appreciation and analysis of English literary texts. The paper also discusses the significance of chiasmus in literary analysis, arguing that it can reveal important thematic connections and deepen the reader's understanding of the text. For instance, chiasmus can highlight contrasts or parallels between characters, events, or ideas. By analyzing the structural and rhetorical effects of chiasmus, the article demonstrates its potential to enrich literary texts in various ways.
References
Angelou M. I know why the caged bird sings. – Bantam, 1997.
Austen J. Pride and prejudice. – Broadview Press, 2001.
Brooks C., Rand P. The well wrought urn: Studies in the structure of poetry. – Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 1947. – №. 11.
Conrad J., Conrad J. Heart of darkness. – Palgrave Macmillan US, 1996. – С. 17-95.
Dubremetz M., Nivre J. Rhetorical figure detection: The case of chiasmus //Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature. – 2015. – С. 23-31.
Dubremetz M., Nivre J. Syntax matters for rhetorical structure: The case of chiasmus //Proceedings of the Fifth Workshop on Computational Linguistics for Literature. – 2016. – С. 47-53.
Engel W. E. Chiastic designs in English literature from Sidney to Shakespeare. – Routledge, 2016.
Fitzgerald F. S. The Great Gatsby (1925). – na, 1991.
Fowler R. A linguistic guide to English poetry: Geoffrey N. Leech, London, Longman, 1969. xvi+ 240 pp //Poetics. – 1973. – Т. 3. – №. 1. – С. 116-117.
Harvey A. J. Chiasmus in English Renaissance literature: The rhetorical, philosophical, and the theological significance of ‘X’in Spenser, Donne, Herbert, and Browne. – The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2001.
Khairzhanova A. et al. Linguistic status of chiasmus in syntactic science //Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores. – 2020. – Т. 7. – №. 2.
McCarthy C. The road. – Pan Macmillan, 2019.
Miller J. W. Antimetabole and Chiasmus //PMLA. – 1990. – Т. 105. – №. 5. – С. 1127-1128.
Nänny M. Chiasmus in literature: Ornament or function? //Word & Image. – 1988. – Т. 4. – №. 1. – С. 51-59.
Pope A. H. G. An essay on man. – Princeton University Press, 2016.
Puputti H. A Rhetorical analysis of Winston Churchill’s speech: We Shall Fight on the Beaches. – 2019.
Roe N. Undefinitive Keats //Literature and Authenticity, 1780–1900. – Routledge, 2016. – С. 39-50.
Shakespeare W. Hamlet: The Texts of 1603 and 1623: Third Series. – Bloomsbury Publishing, 2014.
Shakespeare W. King Richard II: Third Series. – A&C Black, 2002. – Т. 15.
Welch J. W. Chiasmus in antiquity. – Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2020.
Wilde O. The Importance of Being Earnest. 1895 //Act I. – 1990. – Т. 65.
