Comparative Study of Disinfectant Efficacy of Bleach (JIK) and Ethanol against Staphylococcus Aureus and Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ijbea.v1i3.116Keywords:
Disinfectant, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Ethanol, BleachAbstract
A disinfectant is one of the diverse groups of chemicals which reduce the number of microorganisms present on an inanimate object. To determine the comparative study of disinfectant efficacy of Bleach (Jik) and Ethanol against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pure bacteria isolates of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were obtained from Microbiology Laboratory, Federal University of Agriculture Makurdi. These isolates were further confirmed by subjecting them to series of biochemical tests. Results from these confirmatory tests were compared with standard identification keys. Comparative experiment of these two disinfectants (ethanol and bleach) efficacy was conducted against Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa using agar well diffusion method. Different concentrations 100% (v/v), 75% (v/v), 50% (v/v) and 25% (v/v) of bleach and ethanol were tested on both test organisms. The results showed that all the disinfectants inhibited the growth of the test organisms in their concentrated forms. The diameters of zone of inhibitions showed that 100% (v/v) concentration bleach (jik) had the highest zone of inhibition on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa which was measured to be 26.33±1.53 and 20.67±0.58 respectively with 25% (v/v) of bleach showing the least zone of inhibition on the test organisms. For ethanol the highest zone of inhibition was shown at 100% (v/v) concentration with 12.00±2.65 and 10.00±1.00 on Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus respectively while at 25% (v/v) both test organisms were resistant to ethanol. The minimum inhibitory concentration of the bleach disinfectant on Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is determined at 50%, while the test organisms were resistant to the ethanol at all concentrations. Bleach had a better effect on Staphylococcus aureus than Pseudomonas aeruginosa whereas; ethanol had a better effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa than Staphylococcus aureus. Generally Ethanol showed least sensitivity on both test organisms as compared to Bleach.
References
BarindaSena, Debashish Ghost, Maley Saha, Joy deep Mukherjee, (2006). Purification and characterization of a salt, solvent, detergent and bleach tolerant protease from a new gamma-proteobacterium isolated from the marine environment of the sundarbans. Process Biochemistry, 41: 1: 208-215.
Baron, J.E, Finegold, S.M (1990). Methods of testing antimicrobial effectiveness. In Balley Scotts Diag. Microbial Mosby, C. V (Ed) Missouri Pp: 171-194.
Bhatia .R. and Ichhpujani. R.(2008). Essentials of Medical Microbiology,4th edition. New Delhi India, Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Limited.Pp:54-55,141,259.
Carly, N. J, DiCristina, J.A, and Lindsay. D. S, (2006). Activity of bleach, ethanol and two commercial disinfectants against spores of Encephalitozooncuniculi. Veterinary Parasitology, 136(1); 3-4, 31(1); 343-346.
Cheesbrough. M. (2000). District Laboratory Practice, Tropical Countries; part 2. United Kingdom, Cambridge University press Edinburgh.Pp:64-66, 70
Gaonkar, T.A, Geraldo.I.,Shintre.M. and Modak, S.M (2006). In vivo efficacy of an alcohol-based surgical hand disinfectant containing a synergistic combination of ethylhexylglycerin and preservatives. Journal of Hospital Infection,63(12)147-155.
Hamamah, A.A. (2004). Do Different Dilutions of Disinfectants Affect the Development of Bacterial Resistance California State Science Fair Abstract. Retrieved from http://www.usc.edu/cssf/history/2004/ projects. Accessed on July 6, 2020.
Ho-Hyuk .J, Sung-Ho.A, and Kim, M. D,(2008). Use of hydrogen peroxide as an effective disinfectant to Actinobacillusureae. Process Biochemistry, 43(4); 225-228
James Cronmiller, Daniel K. Nelson,Ghasan Salman, Dana K. Jackson, Robert S. Dean, Joseph J. Hsu, Chung H. Kim,(1999). Antimicrobial efficacy of endoscopic disinfection procedures: a controlled, multifactorial investigation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 50(2): 147-158.
Larson. E.L, and Morton, H .E, (1991). Disinfection, Sterilization and Preservation,4th edition. Pp11-15.
Moorer. W.R. (2009). Effectiveness of 70% Ethanol.Retrieved from http/www.wikianswers/ethanol.com.
Rollins, D.M., and Joseph S.W., (2000). Antibiotoic Disk Susceptibilities Department of Cell Biology and Molecular Genetics, University of Maryland.
http://www.life.edu/classroom/bsci424/labmaterials method/antibioticdisk.htm
Sharma, K. (2009). Manual of Microbiology. Ane Books. Pvt. Ltd. P: 405
Udochukwu U, Omoje, F.I, Uloma, T.S and Oseiwe, I.D. (2015). Phytochemical Analysis of Veroniaamygdalania and Ocinumgratissium Extracts and their antibacterial activity on some drug resistance bacteria. AM. J of Res.Comm. 3(5) 225-235
Yi Hsing L., Miyamoto C., and Meighen E.A., (2002). Cloning Sequencing and Functional Studies of the PosgeneFrom Vibrio Larve. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications,
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.