Methods of Upper Jaw Plastic Surgery for Congenital Cleft Lip and Palate

Authors

  • Tojiev F. I. Tashkent State Dentistry Institute
  • Azimov A. M. Tashkent State Dentistry Institute
  • Karimov Sh. I. Tashkent State Dentistry Institute
  • Xasanov SH. M. Tashkent State Dentistry Institute
  • Sharopov S. G. Tashkent State Dentistry Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/ijhsms.v1i5.348

Keywords:

Alveolar bone grafting, alveolar process, congenital cleft lip and palate

Abstract

Alveolar cleft is a tornado-shaped bone defect in the maxillary arch. The treatment goals for alveolar cleft are stabilization and provision of bone continuity to the maxillary arch, permitting support for tooth eruption, eliminating oronasal fistulas, providing an improved esthetic result, and improving speech. Treatment protocols vary in terms of the operative time, surgical techniques, and graft materials. Early approaches including boneless bone grafting (gingivoperiosteoplasty) and primary bone graft fell into disfavor because they impaired facial growth, and they remain controversial. Secondary bone graft (SBG) is not the most perfect method, but long-term follow-up has shown that the graft is absorbed to a lesser extent, does not impede facial growth, and supports other teeth. Accordingly, SBG in the mixed dentition phase (6–11 years) has become the preferred method of treatment. The most commonly used graft material is cancellous bone from the iliac crest. Recently, many researchers have investigated the use of allogeneic bone, artificial bone, and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein, along with growth factors because of their ability to decrease donor-site morbidity. Further investigations of bone substitutes and additives will continue to be needed to increase their effectiveness and to reduce complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aslıhan Uzel and Z. Nazan Alparslan. Long-Term Effects of Presurgical Infant Orthopedics in Patients With Cleft Lip and Palate: A Systematic Review // Cleft Palate Craniofac. J. -2011.-№ 48.-Р.587–595.

Azimov M.I., Amanullaev R.A. Problems and prospects of complex rehabilitation of children with congenital maxillofacial anomalies // Stomatologiya. -Ташкент.-2004.-№ 3-4.-С.62-64.

Azimov M.I., Inoyatov A.Sh., Sharopov S.G. Impact of teratogenic factors on the immune system of women who gave birth to children with congenital cleft lip and palate // Journal of Clinical and Theoretical Medicine (Tashkent). - 2015. - № 5. - С. 88-91.

Azimov M.I., Shomurodov K.E. A new method of uranoplasty in patients with congenital cleft palate. Stomatologiya.-Tashkent. - 2017.- №6.- С.55-58.

Al Khubeishi Ahmed Mohamed. Improvement of specialized care for children with congenital maxillofacial pathology in the Republic of Yemen: Ph. D. in medical sciences. - T., 2012. - 22 p.

Amanullayev R.A. Congenital cleft lip and palate. Textbook. - Tashkent, 2014. - P.30-35.

Amanullaev R.A. Complex rehabilitation of children with congenital cleft upper lip and palate on the basis of a specialized center. Topical Questions of Clinic, Diagnosis and Treatment in a Multidisciplinary Hospital: April 20-21, 2005. // Military Medical Academy. Saint-Petersburg, 2005.-number 8.-p. 3.

Amanullaev R.A. Comparative evaluation of methods of primary cheiloplasty in children with unilateral congenital cleft upper lip and palate. - Tashkent, 2002.-P. 122.

Amanullaev R.A. Frequency of birth of children with congenital cleft lip and palate in large regions of Uzbekistan // Congenital and hereditary pathology of the head, face and neck in children: current issues of complex treatment. Mater. scientific-conference. - Moscow, 2006. - С. 14-15.

Arsenina O.I., Malashenkova Ye.I., Pashchenko S.A. Algorithm of orthodontic treatment of patients with congenital cleft lip, palate and alveolar process before and after bone autoplasty // Dentistry.-2017.-#5.-P. 62-65.

Arutyunov S.D., Pivovarov A.A., Ordzhonikidze R.Z. Modern technology of orthopedic dental treatment of cancer patients with upper jaw defects in the early postoperative period // Modern problems of science and education. - 2016. - NO. 5.-URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=25320.

Bersenev S.V. Optimization of the choice of methods of maxillofacial prosthetics of adult patients in the long-term after surgical treatment for congenital cleft of the upper lip, alveolar process and palate: dissertation. Candidate of medical sciences. - Moscow State Medical University, 2010, 199 p.

Egorova M.V. Orthodontic treatment of young children with unilateral cleft upper lip and palate using a metal device with shape memory effect in the apparatus. Author's thesis. .... D. in medical sciences.-Moscow, 2011. - 24 p.

Efremian A.M. Prospectivity of CAD/CAM technology in the treatment of patients with dental defects // International Student Scientific Bulletin. - 2016. - NO. 2.-URL: http://eduherald.ru/ru/article/view?id=15396

Inoyatov A.Sh., Suleimanov S.F., Tozhiev F.I. Epidemiological frequency of congenital dental anomalies in Bukhara region // Dental and somatic diseases in children: etiopathogenetic aspects, their relationship, features of prevention, diagnosis and treatment: Mater. Federal District of the Russian Federation with international participants. December 12-13, 2013. - Tver (Russia), 2013. - С. 189-191.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-09

How to Cite

F. I. , T. ., A. M., A. ., Sh. I., K. ., SH. M. , X. ., & S. G. , S. . (2022). Methods of Upper Jaw Plastic Surgery for Congenital Cleft Lip and Palate . INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SYSTEMS AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 1(5), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.51699/ijhsms.v1i5.348