Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Gallbladder Disease

Authors

  • Dr. Dhafer Ahmad Yuhia M.B.Ch.B., F.I.C.M.S. \ (General Surgeon) Iraqi Ministry of Health, Al-Russafa Health Department, Al_Sheck Zaid General Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Dr. Firas Manuel Naamo M.B.Ch.B., C.A.B.M.S., F.I.C.M.S. \ (General Surgeon) Iraqi Ministry of Health, Al-Russafa Health Department, Al_Sheck Zaid General Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.
  • Dr. Haider Tarq Raoof M.B.Ch.B., D.G.S. \ (Diploma General Surgery) Iraqi Ministry of Health, Al-Russafa Health Department, Al_Sheck Zaid General Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq.

Keywords:

Cholecystitis; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Open cholecystectomy, post-operative complications; quality of life.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a procedure frequently performed worldwide by general surgeons. In a significant number of cases, it is performed on elderly patients with cholecystitis.

Objective: This study was focused on assessing and comparing outcomes related to laparoscopic and open Surgery for patients with gallbladder disease.

Patients and methods:  A cross-sectional study were conducted for patients who underwent cholecystectomy, which included 155 patients whose ages ranged from <35 years to 50 years of age in different hospitals in Iraq for a period between July 14, 2022, to August 26, 2023. The clinical data of the patients were determined, and they were divided into two groups, where group A included 80 patients and group B included 75 patients. This study was conducted between both surgeries, which are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy, by recording the rate of complications, assessing the degree of pain, and evaluating the quality of life of patients after surgery.

Results: In comparison between the two surgeries, the intraoperative data recorded that the duration of laparoscopic cholecystectomy surgery was (56.14 ± 11.88) minutes and the duration of open cholecystectomy surgery was (84.36 ± 15.78), the rate of patients who had blood loss was 18 in group A and 29 patients in group A. B, the duration of hospital stay was 3.2 ± 0.3 days and 5.8 ± 0.7 days, and the death rate in group A was 0 cases while group B got 2 cases. Regarding the results after the two kinds of operations, our study recorded the rate of postoperative complications, which shows that there were 15 patients who had postoperative complications in group A, while in group B, 25 patients were included, and the most common complications were wound infection and bleeding.

Conclusion: The current study indicates that laparoscopic cholecystectomy surpasses open cholecystectomy in the management of gallbladder disease because it presents less postoperative pain and a more accepted and preferred aesthetic result by patients.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, Branum GD, Hunter JG: Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 2001; 234:549–558.

Ballal M, David G, Willmott S, Corless DJ, Deakin M, Slavin JP: Conversion after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in England. Surg Endosc 2009; 23:2338–2344.

Alkatout I, Mechler U, Mettler L, et al. The development of laparoscopy-a historical overview. Front Surg. 2021; 8:799442.

Duman K, Sezer K.H, Yılmaz F, Akın M.L: The clinical outcome of traditional laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Gaziantep Med J 2013;19 (1): 35-39.

Duncan C.B & Riall T.S: Evidence-Based Current Surgical Practice: Calculous Gallbladder Disease. J Gastrointest Surg 2012; 16:2011–2025.

Hussain A, Mahmood H, Singhal T, Balakrishnan S, Nicholls J, El-Hasani S: Long-term study of port-site incisional hernia after laparoscopic procedures. JSLS 2009; 13:346–349.

Ivatury SJ, Louden CL, Schwesinger WH: Contributing factors to postoperative length of stay in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS 2011; 15:174–178.

Karimian F, Aminian A, Mirsharifi R, Mehrkhani F: Surgical options in the management of cystic duct avulsion during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patient Safety in Surgery 2008; 2:17.

Kreimer F, Cunha DJ, Ferreira CC, Rodrigues TM, Fulco LG, Godoy ES. Comparative analysis of preoperative ultrasonography reports with intraoperative surgical findings in cholelithiasis. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016 Mar;29 (1):26-9.

Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Giovannini I, Ardito F, D’Acapito F, Vellone M, et al.: Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of an Italian national survey on cholecystectomies. Arch Surg 2005; 140:986–992.

Passos MA, Portari-Filho PE. Antibiotic prophylaxis in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it worth doing? Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2016 Jul-Sep;29 (3):170-172.

Ulkarni N, Arulampalam T. Laparoscopic surgery reduces the incidence of surgical site infections compared to the open approach for colorectal procedures: a meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol. 2020; 24 (10): 1017-1024.

Sheffield KM, Ramos KE, Djukom CD, Jimenez CJ, Mileski WJ, Kimbrough TD, Townsend CM, Jr., Riall TS: Implementation of a critical pathway for complicated gallstone disease: translation of population-based data into clinical practice. J Am Coll Surg 2011;212: 835–843.

Strasberg SM: Error traps and vascular-biliary injury in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2008; 15:284–292.

Enk MS, Olcucuoğlu E, Kaya İO. Evaluation of complications after laparoscopic and open appendectomy by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical risk calculator. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022; 28 (4): 418-427.

Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, High R, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D: Safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc 2011; 25:1127–1135.

Varela JE, Wilson SE, Nguyen NT: Laparoscopic surgery significantly reduces surgical-site infections compared with open surgery. Surg Endosc 2010;24 (2):270–276.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-29

How to Cite

Dr. Dhafer Ahmad Yuhia, Dr. Firas Manuel Naamo, & Dr. Haider Tarq Raoof. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Laparoscopic and Open Surgery for Gallbladder Disease. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SYSTEMS AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 3(1), 137–145. Retrieved from https://inter-publishing.com/index.php/IJHSMS/article/view/3399

Issue

Section

Articles