Rehabilitation of Patients after Ischemic Stroke Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Authors

  • S. S. Pulatov Bukhara State Medical Institute
  • B. G. Gafurov Bukhara State Medical Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/ijhsms.v2i6.2143

Keywords:

stroke, transcranial electrical stimulation, rehabilitation

Abstract

45 patients in the acute period of ischemic stroke, aged 39–71 years were examined. All patients underwent: a study of neurological and somatic status, with verification of neurological deficit according to the NIHSS scale , to assess impairment of consciousness and coma, the Glasgow scale, to assess the degree of motor and daily activity using the Rankin and Barthel scale , to assess the recovery of motor deficit after a stroke, the APAT test was used . The use of TES in patients with stroke, regardless of the electrode application area, improves cognitive functions in naming objects, performing speech functions, which is accompanied by an increase in patients' motivation for rehabilitation and treatment and is reflected in an improvement in their quality of life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ivanova G.E., Belkin A.A., Belyaev A.F. Pilot project "Development of the system of medical rehabilitation in the Russian Federation". System for monitoring and monitoring the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation in acute cerebrovascular accidents. Bulletin of the Ivanovo Medical Academy. 2016; 21(1): 6–14.

Elsner B., Kugler J., Pohl M., Mehrholz J. Transcranial direct current stimulation ( tDCS ) for improving activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning, in people after stroke (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2020; 11: CD 009645.

Brunoni AR, Amadera J., Berbel B. et al. A systematic review on reporting and assessment of adverse effects associated with transcranial direct current stimulation. Int. J.

Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011; 14(8): 1133–1145.

Chhabraa H., Bosea A., Shivakumara V. et al. Tolerance of transcranial direct current stimulation in psychiatric disorders: An analysis of 2000+ sessions. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 28(4): 112744.

Pelletier SJ, Cicchetti F. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of transcranial direct current stimulation: Evidence from in vitro and in vivo models. Int. J. Neuropsychopharmacol .

; 18(2): 47. DOI: 10.1093/ ijnp /pyu047

Yoon KJ, Oh BM, Kim DY Functional improvement and neuroplastic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation ( tDCS ) delivered 1 day vs. 1 week after cerebral ischemia in rats. Brain Res.2012; 1452:61–72.

Fridriksson J., Elm J., Stark BC et al. BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment. Brain Stimulus. 2018; 11(6): 1276–1281.

Biou E., Cassoudesalle H., Cogne M., et al. Transcranial direct current stimulation in post-stroke aphasia rehabilitation: a systematic review // Ann Phys Rehabil . Med. 2019 Vol. 62, no. 2. R. 104-121.

Bakulin I. S., Lagoda D. Yu. Poidasheva A. G., etc. Transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke hemianopia // Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2020. T. 14, no. 2. C. 5–14.

Shelyakin A.M. micropolarization // Physiotherapy. National leadership. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media, 2009.864 With.

A.M.Shelyakin, I.G.Preobrazhenskaya, O.V.Bogdanov. // Micropolarizing therapy in pediatric neurology. Moscow: Medkniga , 2010.79 p.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Pulatov , S. S. ., & Gafurov , B. G. . (2023). Rehabilitation of Patients after Ischemic Stroke Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH SYSTEMS AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2(6), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.51699/ijhsms.v2i6.2143

Issue

Section

Articles