TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN MARGINAL LANDMASS UTILIZATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN GOROHO BANANA (Musa acuminafe sp) QUALITY AND PRODUCTIONS

Authors

  • Dr. Anatje Lihiang, M.P Biology Department, Mathematics and Natural Sciences Faculty, Manado State University, Tondano, 95619 Indonesia, Correspondency author: [email protected]
  • Dr. Meitilistina Sasinggala, M.Si Biology Department, Mathematics and Natural Sciences Faculty, Manado State University, Tondano, 95619 Indonesia, [email protected]

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/ijbea.v1i5.468

Keywords:

marginal landmass, improvement, goroho banana, Musa acuminafe

Abstract

This study was conducted in the rural outskirts of Tomohon, North Sulawesi, 2018-2019, involving 4 local farmers as participators in this study. Each farmer was provided with 0.5 Ha of land to manage, where half (0.25Ha) was managed on their own and half (0.25Ha) was managed alongside with the researcher. Thus on the plots managed by coaching alongside with the researcher, it was introduced the utilization of a healthy bulb sortation, planting distance organization, organic and inorganic fertilization processes, panama disease control by the use of Trichoderma spp., plant productivity control.  Yields in plots where farm management coaching took place resulted in an increase in productivity up to 442.66 ton/Ha, while farm management according the local famers method traditionally yielded only 17.68 ton/Ha. Yet based on economic analysis, the traditional methods by the local farmers resulted in a better benefit/cost ratio due to the lower production cost, while net profits of a well-managed farm (coached method) produced higher profitability. In aspects of continuity and sustainability as well as agri-economical profits, the improvements in production management (method coached by researcher) proved better than that of the traditional method by the farmers.

References

ANONYMPOUS. 2007. Association for the improvement in production and utilitation of banana. www.aipub.org/index.htm

Bohn HL, Meneal BL and Connor GAO. 1997. Soil Chemistry, John Willey & Sons. New York, p. 329

BPS North Sulawesi. 2005. .Statistic of North Sulawesi Province.

Cahyono B. 1996. Banana : Cultivation and Feasibility Study. Kanisius Yogyakarta.

Cosico WC. 2000. Crop logging for diagnosis of nutrient needs of banana.professorial lecture as Central Bank Chair.UPLB Los Banos. Philippines.

Edmendes SM, Smale and Karamura D. 2006. Promising crop biotechnologies for smallholder farmes in East Africa: Bananas and Maize. International Food Policy Research Institute. http://www,ifpri.org/pubs/rag/br1004/br1004-24.pdf

Jacobson. 2005.Harvesting hope: Kenyan farmers celebrate first banana harvest using new growing technology. http:// [email protected]

Kasim, F., and C. E. Wasson. 1990. Genotype Response of Corn to Aluminium Stress. Seeding Test for Measuring Aluminium Tolerance in Nutrien Solution.Indon. J. of Crop Sci. %(2): 41-45.

Lagewal, G. 2005. Bananas In Kwazulu-Natal. Agriculture and Enviromental Affairs. Kwazulu-Natal. http://agriculture.kzntl.gov.za/ portal/Pulications.

Mulyani S. 2008. Fertilizer and how to fertilizing. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Smithson PCB, Mclntyre D, Gold CS, Sali H, Night G and Okech S. 2004. Potassium and magnesium fertlizers on banana in Uganda: Yields, weevil damage, foliar nutrient status and DRIS analysis. Journal of Nutrient Cycling in Agro-ecosystems. Springer Netherlands 69(1) : 43-49.

Wikipedia. 2006. Banana. http://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pisang#column-one.

Zake YK, Bwamiki DP and Nkwiine C. 2000. Soil management requirements for banana production on the heavy soils around Lake Victoria in Uganda. International Conference on Banana and Plantain for Africa Intenational Society for Horticultural Science Vol. 1.Kampala Uganda.Pp.540.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-21

How to Cite

Dr. Anatje Lihiang, M.P, & Dr. Meitilistina Sasinggala, M.Si. (2022). TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN MARGINAL LANDMASS UTILIZATION FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN GOROHO BANANA (Musa acuminafe sp) QUALITY AND PRODUCTIONS . International Journal of Biological Engineering and Agriculture, 1(5), 85–90. https://doi.org/10.51699/ijbea.v1i5.468

Issue

Section

Articles