Effect of 5Es Constructivist Instructional Approach on Students’ Interest in Summary Writing in Benue State, Nigeria

Authors

  • Maor, Member Comfort Government Model College, Makurdi
  • Evelyn Ukoha Department of Arts Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka
  • Atim, Dekera Gerald Department of Educational Foundations and General Studies, Joseph Saawuan Tarka University
  • Nnamani P Amuche Department of Arts Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51699/ijllal.v1i3.377

Keywords:

5Es Constructivist Instructional Approach, Interest and Summary Writing

Abstract

The study determined the effect of 5Es constructivist instructional approach on students’ interest in summary writing in Benue State, Nigeria. Two research questions and three hypotheses guided the study. The study adopted a quasi-experimental design, specifically, the pre-test post-test non-randomized design. The population of the study consisted of One thousand six hundred and fifty nine (1,659) senior secondary class two (SS II) students in the Makurdi Local Government Area of Benue State. The sample size for the study was one hundred and seventy six students (79 males and 97 females) which were randomly drawn from four intact classes in four co-educational schools in the Local Government Area. The instrument for data collection was Summary Writing Interest Inventory (SWII). The validation of the instrument was done by experts from the University of Nigeria Nsukka. The reliability index 0.72 of was obtained for SWII which was done using Cronbach’s Alpha. The research questions were answered using mean and standard deviation while the hypotheses was tested using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) at 0.05 level of significance. The findings of the study showed that 5Es constructivist instructional approach had a greater effect on students’ interest in summary writing than the conventional group. Also, it was revealed that gender had no influence on students’ interest in summary writing. Moreover, there was no interaction effect of instructional approach and gender on the mean interest scores of students in summary writing. Based on the findings, the researchers recommended among others that secondary school teachers should use the 5Es constructivist instructional approach in teaching summary writing in their classes.

References

Achor, B. (2007). Cognitive style, cognitive development and achievement in senior secondary school science (Physics) (Unpublished Ph.D Thesis). University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Aimunmondium, M. C. (2009). Effects of thought-flow knowledge and shared reading instructional strategies on senior secondary students' achievements in English reading comprehension and summary writing. (Unpublished Doctorate Thesis). University of Ibadan.

Bosely, L. (2008). I don’t teach reading: Critical reading instruction in composition course. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47, 280-308.

Bybee, R. W., Tayior, J.A; Gardner, A., scotter, P.V., Powell, J.C., Westbook, A. & Lander, N. (2006). Teh BSCS 5E Instructional approach: Origins and effectiveness. A Report prepared for the office of science Education National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from science. Education nih. Gov/house of reps. Ns/b82d55fal138783c 2852572c9004f 5566/&FILE/Appendix%20D.

Collins, H, (2010), understanding persuasive essay writing: Linguistic/rhetorical ApproachText5(4) 309-326.

Ekawat , W. S. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning on EFL university student summary writing (Unpublished Master’s Thesis), Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.

God’s power-Echie, G., & Ihenko , S. (2017) influence of gender on interest and academic achievement of students in intergrated science in Obio Alepo Local Government Area of River State.European Science journal, 72-278 htt://don org/10.19044/esj.2017. Vl3nlop 272.

Hidi, S., & Reninger, K.A. (2006). The four-phase approach of interest: development, Educational psychologist, 41(2), 111 – 127 Moodle 2. Knanchia.fi 19 – 05 – 2015.

Ikonta, R.N., & Ugbede J. N. (2012). Reading strategies: A catalyst for enhancing comprehension and summary writing proficiency among high school students in Lagos State. Unilag journal of Humanities, 2(1), 55-58.

Kim, J. S. (2005). The effect of a constructivist teaching approach on student academic achievement, self-concept, and learning strategies. Journal of Asia Pacific Education Review, 6(1), 7-19

Kleinfeld, C. (2006). Gender differences in reading achievement policy implementations and best practices. Retrieved from http://www.ingeitconmeat

Nzegwu, J.C. (2018). Effect of phonics instructional method on interest and achievement of primary school pupils in reading. (Unpublished Doctorate Thesis). Department of Arts Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Obianuju, R.O. (2017). Effects of constructivist-based instructional approach on college of education students’ achievement and interest in the English language essay writing in South-East Zone Nigeria, (Unpublished Doctorate Thesis). Faculty of Education University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Ochogwu, C. E. & Ukume, G. D. (2016). Developing Literacy Skills: The pearls of storytelling in creative writing across gender. Literacy and reading in Nigeria, 16(1), 46-54.

Ogboji, B.A. (2013). Effect of local resources on students’ achievement and interest in cultural and creative arts in Nsukka, Enugu State Nigeria, (unpublished doctorate thesis). Faculty of Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Ogundola, I.L. (2014). Effect of Inquiry technique on interest of technical college students in auto mechanic in Nigeria. IOSR journal of Research & Method in Education, 4 (2), 53 – 60.

Omeje, H.O. (2002). Effect of instructional building approach on students' performance and interest in technical drawing. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 2(1), 85-86.

Omiston, S. (2003). Gender gap: boy’s own story. Retrieved on November, 2007, from http://www.cbc.ca.news/background/gender/

Onukaogu, C.E. (2000). Towards understanding of reaching, In C.I.E. Onukaoyu, A.E Anua and O.B Jeqede (Eds), Teaching reading in Nigeria: A guide-book to theory and practice, Ile-Efe: TAWL Centre of Excellence.

Sandrock, J. W. (2004). Educational psychology. (2nd Edition). New York: McGraw Hill.

Scott, C. (2014). Opinion: Gender inequality and urban informality. Climate Development Knowledge Network. Retrieved from http://cdkn.org/2014/06/opinion-gender-inequality-and-urban-informality-what-it-means-for-climate-compatible-development/.

Sharma, H. L. & Poonam, G. (2016). Constructivist approach for teaching English: Making sense of paradigm shift from the traditional approach. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5(1).

Shikaan, V.M. (2013). Impact of field-based inquiry method of instructor on primary school pupil’s science achievement, retention and process skill Acquisition. (Unpublished M.Ed thesis) Benue State University Makurdi.

Ukoha, E.O. (2017) Effect of computer text gloss strategy on Senior Secondary School Students’ achievement and interest in reading comprehension in Enugu State, (unpublished doctorate thesis). Department of Arts Education, University of Nigeria Nsukka.

Ukume, G. D. (2010). Effect of recreational reading programme on senior secondary II students’ writing ability and reading interest. (Unpublished M.Ed thesis) Benue State University.

Uwalaka, A.J. & Offorma, G.C. (2015). Effect of constructivist leaching method on students' achievement in French listing comprehension in Owerri North LGA of Imo State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(1), 11-19

Wilder, M., & Shuttleworth, P. (2005). Cell inquiry: A 5E learning cycle lesson. Science Activities, 41(4), 37-43.

Zurine, K. (2013). A study of students’ reading interest in a second language. International Journal of Education studies 6 (11) 160-170 www.ccsenet.org/ies

Downloads

Published

2022-11-10

How to Cite

Comfort, M. M. ., Ukoha, E. ., Gerald, A. D. ., & Amuche, N. P. . (2022). Effect of 5Es Constructivist Instructional Approach on Students’ Interest in Summary Writing in Benue State, Nigeria. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.51699/ijllal.v1i3.377