Comparative Study of International Practices in Developing Sociocultural Competence
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ijllal.v3i1.3274Keywords:
sociocultural competence, intercultural understanding, cross-cultural communication, international practices, comparative studyAbstract
This article presents a comparative study on international practices in developing sociocultural competence and explores their potential application in the context of Uzbekistan. Sociocultural competence is crucial for effective intercultural understanding and communication in a globalized world. Drawing from a range of global practices, including educational initiatives, intercultural training programs, policies, and community engagement efforts, this study identifies effective strategies for enhancing sociocultural competence. The analysis highlights the importance of integrating sociocultural competence into educational curricula, providing experiential learning opportunities, delivering intercultural communication training, and promoting community engagement. The findings underscore the significance of multicultural policies and inclusive education. Recommendations are presented for educators, policymakers, intercultural trainers, and individuals engaged in cross-cultural interactions in Uzbekistan to foster sociocultural competence. By applying successful strategies from international practices and tailoring them to the Uzbekistan’s context, the article provides guidance to cultivate a culturally inclusive society that values diversity and promotes intercultural understanding and effective communication.
References
Akkari A., Radhouane M. Intercultural Approaches to Education. From Theory to Practice. Springer, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70825-2
Armstrong, Josh. (2020). Assessing Intercultural Competence in International Leadership Courses: Developing the Global Leader. The Journal of Leadership Education. 19. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.12806/V19/I4/R1.
Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2021). Intercultural Understanding. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/cross-curriculum-priorities/intercultural-understanding/
Bennett, M. J. (2008). Defining, measuring, and facilitating intercultural learning: A conceptual introduction to the Intercultural Education Double Supplement. Intercultural Education, 19(6), 401-409.
Byram, M. (1997). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Multilingual Matters.
Deardorff, D. K. (2006). Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. Journal of Studies in International Education, 10(3), 241-266.
Hammer, M. R., Bennett, M. J., & Wiseman, R. (2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The Intercultural Development Inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27(4), 421-443.
Lasauskiene J. (2017). A study of foreign students’ intercultural experiences at Lithuanian University of educational sciences. New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences [Online]. 4(1), pp.691-699. Available from: www.prosoc.eu
Maznevski, M., & Chudoba, K. M. (2000). Bridging space over time: Global virtual team dynamics and effectiveness. Organization Science, 11(5), 473-492.
Potts, D. (2016). Outcomes of Learning Abroad Programs. Australian Government Department of Education and Training. URL: https://www.ieaa.org.au/documents/item/750
Thomas, D. C., & Inkson, K. (2005). Cultural intelligence: People skills for global business. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Ward, C., Bochner, S., & Furnham, A. (2004). The psychology of culture shock. Routledge.
