Digital Transformation and Administrative Efficiency Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51699/ajsld.v3i1.3444Keywords:
digital data, digital transformation, education, administrative studyAbstract
This study investigates how the incorporation of digital technologies to improve productivity and simplify operations affects administrative efficiency. Using Microsoft Excel, Scopus, RStudio, VOSviewer, and a bibliometric analytic technique, we examine articles and case studies from 2018 to July 2023. The significance of data analysis tools in promoting well-informed decision-making, maximizing resource allocation, and enhancing overall administrative performance is highlighted by our findings. We provide firms looking to capitalize on the advantages of digital transformation practical insights by analyzing certain digital technologies and successful deployments. The report clarifies how businesses may use technology to satisfy changing client needs, outperform rivals, and guarantee effective resource management. By offering practical strategies grounded in industry benchmarks and case studies, this research equips organizations with the knowledge to navigate the complexities of digital transformation and capitalize on its transformative potential.
References
V. M. Cvetković, J. Tanasić, A. Öcal, Ž. Kešetović, N. Nikolić, and A. Dragašević, “Capacity Development of Local Self-Governments for Disaster Risk Management,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public. Health, vol. 18, no. 19, p. 10406, 2021, doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910406.
C. Gong and V. Ribière, “Developing a unified definition of digital transformation,” Technovation, vol. 102, p. 102217, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217.
C. Gebayew, I. Hardini, G. Panjaitan, N. Kurniawan, and Suhardi, “A Systematic Literature Review on Digital Transformation,” IEEE Conf. Inf. Commun. Technol. Syst. ICTSS, pp. 1–6, 2018, doi: 10.1109/icitsi.2018.8695912.
A. Hanelt, R. Bohnsack, D. Marz, and C. Marante, “A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change,” J. Manag. Stud., vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1159–1197, 2020, doi: 10.1111/joms.12639.
S. Nambisan, K. Lyytinen, A. Majchrzak, and M. Song, “Digital Innovation Management: Reinventing Innovation Management Research in a Digital World,” Manag. Inf. Syst. Q., vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 223–238, 2017, doi: 10.25300/misq/2017/41:1.03.
Y. Gong, J. Yang, and X. Shi, “Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital transformation in government: Analysis of flexibility and enterprise architecture,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 3, p. 101487, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2020.101487.
L. Espina-Romero, J. Sánchez, G. Rojas-Cangahuala, J. Garay, D. Parra, and J. Corredoira, “Digital Leadership in an Ever-Changing World: A Bibliometric Analysis of Trends and Challenges,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 17, p. 13129, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su151713129.
H. Wang, J. Feng, H. Zhang, and X. Li, “The effect of digital transformation strategy on performance: The moderating role of cognitive conflict,” Int. J. Confl. Manag., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 441–462, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1108/IJCMA-09-2019-0166.
M. Kuusisto, “Organizational effects of digitalization: A literature review,” Int. J. Organ. Theory Behav., vol. 20, no. 03, pp. 341–362, 2017, doi: 10.1108/ijotb-20-03-2017-b003.
M. Markus, “Technochange Management: Using IT to Drive Organizational Change,” J. Inf. Technol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 4–20, 2004, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000002.
N. Reinhard, “Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research,” Manag. Rev. Q., 2020, doi: 10.1007/s11301-020-00185-7.
G. Vial, “Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda,” J. Strateg. Inf. Syst., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 118–144, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003.
M. Kodama, “Digitally transforming work styles in an era of infectious disease,” Int. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 55, p. 102172, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102172.
M. Culnan and J. Bair, “Human communication needs and organizational productivity: The potential impact of office automation,” J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 215–221, 1983, doi: 10.1002/asi.4630340308.
A. Peshkov, “Construction company administration of intangible resources in the face of uncertainty,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 880, no. 1, p. 012113, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/880/1/012113.
Q. Guan, “Optimization of Administrative Efficiency and Educational Methods Based on Information Technology,” Proc. 30th ACM Int. Conf. Inf. Knowl. Manag., pp. 2975–2978, 2021, doi: 10.1145/3456887.3457108.
S. Li, “Application of Computer Technology in Administrative Management,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1769, no. 1, p. 012074, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1769/1/012074.
Н. Ткаленко, O. Mykhailovska, В. Маргасова, O. Garafonova, and O. Pishchenko, “Environmental Component Of Sustainable Development Of Territorial Communities,” Probl. Anal. Upr., vol. 4, no. 51, p. 4059, 2023, doi: 10.55643/fcaptp.4.51.2023.4059.
E. Seekamp, J. Flocks, C. Hotchkiss, L. York, and K. Irick, “Gulf Islands National Seashore regional sediment budget research and data needs—Workshop series summary,” US Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep., vol. 2022, no. 1087, pp. 1–35, 2023, doi: 10.3133/ofr20221087.
G. Paparella, “Losing China? Truman’s Nationalist Beliefs and the American Strategic Approach to China, 1948–1949,” Int. J., vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 486–508, 2021, doi: 10.1080/07075332.2021.2018344.
S. Myeong and K. Shahzad, “Integrating Data-Based Strategies and Advanced Technologies with Efficient Air Pollution Management in Smart Cities,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 13, p. 7168, 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13137168.
C. Schürmann, D. Geiger, M. Picha, and R. Thomas, “CITY2NAVIGATION (C2N)—A NEW SERVICE FOR DIGITAL, FUTURE-PROOF URBAN TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT,” ISPRS Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci., vol. XLVI-4/W1-2021, pp. 103–110, 2021, doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-xlvi-4-w1-2021-103-2021.
